About Richard C.
Richard C. Flanigan's path mixed army education and legal learn about. He earned a Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy in 1964 and returned to school after numerous years to complete a J.D. at Boston College Law School in 1971. Those two establishments set a clear intellectual tone: disciplined, methodical, and exacting.
After law program he established a career practicing within the mid-Atlantic. He is admitted to the bars of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Over the many years he has maintained a tradition that serves clients across the ones two states, adapting to moving case regulation and regulatory change because the legal panorama advanced.
His education at West Point and Boston College Law School shapes the way he strategies legal work. The army education is evident in a prepared, procedural bent. The legal background provides careful evaluation and an emphasis on precedent. Colleagues describe a person who plans deliberately and values readability in written work and courtroom presentations.
Flanigan has labored from multiple offices at some point of his career, reflecting a practice that moved together with his clients and possibilities. He has handled matters that required coordination across state lines. That experience gave him realistic information of differences in procedure and practice among Pennsylvania and New Jersey courts, and the practicalities of managing files and time limits under two separate bar regimes.
Clients and friends have noted his continuous presence in regional legal circles. He has been a lawyer through several eras of difference: shifts in technology, the upward push of complicated regulatory schemes, and evolving civil and business practice norms. He has utilized the fundamentals he learned at his schools to the daily demands of case management, bargaining, and legal proceedings when required.
In recent years he has continued to counsel and constitute individuals and entities in things heard in courts and tribunals in his admitted jurisdictions. He handles daily practice matters and the more complex issues that require careful studies and procedural attention. He remains active in private practice, serving clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
He presently keeps a regulation practice serving clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
