About Matthew Curtis
Matthew Curtis Parson educated as a political scientist earlier than turning to law. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, with minors in International Studies and English, from Pennsylvania State University, Erie — The Behrend College, graduating with honors in 2001 and a three.60 GPA. He then attended The Catholic University of America and acquired his J.D. in 2004, taking coursework in household regulation and felony defense regulation at some point of his time there.
He is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia, and he maintains club in the Pennsylvania State Bar. Early in his legal work he moved into courtroom practice and client advocacy. He opened his personal workplace in 2007 and has practiced beneath the call Matthew C. Parson, Lawyer At Law since then. Running a solo practice has required him to manage each the legal work and the demands of managing a small firm.
Parson’s caseload displays the areas he studied in law program. He handles household regulation matters such as divorce hearings, parental custody and help issues, and associated domestic relations disputes. He additionally advocates for clients in felony matters, from arraignment through trial when necessary. His work has concerned negotiating settlements, preparing legal proceedings substances and acting in each trial and appellate settings when cases development.
Outside of client files, Parson keeps recent through the Pennsylvania State Bar and by following developments in each family and felony regulation across his admitted jurisdictions. That club offers get entry to to ongoing legal training and peer networks that inform day-to-day practice. He has stored his practice small by layout, which lets in him to control the scope of cases he accepts and to manage client contact personally.
Colleagues describe Parson as practical in the court and straightforward with clients. He has a tendency to give an explanation for alternatives plainly and to pursue results that align with a client’s objectives instead of taking unnecessary dangers. He has handled things in both city and suburban courts and is accustomed to the procedural differences between state and District of Columbia practice. He continues to operate his office in Pennsylvania and represents clients in each household regulation and criminal defense matters as his recent practice center of attention.
