About Robert Louis
Robert Louis Mellinger brings four decades of court and counseling knowledge to a tradition that spans state and federal venues. He earned his J.D. from Southwestern University School of Law in 1978 after finishing a B.A. in psychology and political science at Washington & Jefferson College in 1974. Those early educational choices set a practical tone for a profession spent dealing with complicated legal matters across jurisdictions.
After law school, Mellinger built a practice that crosses state lines. He is licensed to practice in California, New York, Pennsylvania and Florida, and he is likewise admitted to appear earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court. That multi-jurisdictional status has allowed him to symbolize clients in a selection of matters that require navigation of differing state procedures and federal thresholds. He has labored in personal practice for maximum of his profession and has experience collaborating with colleagues on things that pass between trial courts and better appellate boards.
His work has concerned litigation, client counseling and transactional things. He has represented people and businesses. He has handled cases that required careful preparation for trial and appeals. Colleagues describe him as methodical in his preparation and planned in court presentation. He favors clean rationalization over technical flourish and tends to concentrate on the realistic implications of case strategy for clients.
Mellinger maintains active memberships in expert institutions and bar teams. He has participated in bar activities that bring collectively attorneys throughout disciplines, and he has engaged with peers from multiple states to stay recent on growing law. Outside of legal organizations he has drawn on his undergraduate background in psychology and political science to form how he strategies client communication and case theory.
Today he practices thru ROBERT L. MELLINGER, P.A./CASERTA & SPIRITI, PLLC. His office handles things that variety from contested legal proceedings to transactional questions and appellate work. He continues to take instances that require admission across state lines or earlier than federal courts. His recent practice makes a speciality of legal proceedings and appellate representation for clients in state and federal courts.
