About David
David Haber took a continuous path into law from science. He earned a B.S. in Biological Anthropology and Anatomy from Duke University in 2000 and a J.D. from Columbia Law School in 2003. Those credentials shaped how he strategies technical and legal problems. They also located him for work that spans courts and company proceedings.
He began his professional legal career the same year he left Columbia, becoming a member of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as an associate in 2003. That early duration was spent in a large-firm environment the place federal judiciary practice and complex filings are the norm. Over time he moved into private practice and took on a partnership role at Cobert Haber & Haber, LLP. His profession trail displays a move from a countrywide regulation firm to a smaller store where he may perhaps handle things end to end.
Haber is licensed to practice in New York and is indexed for practice earlier than numerous federal forums. Those consist of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the Federal Circuit. That set of admissions shows routine involvement in each district court litigation and company proceedings.
His undergraduate study in biology-related fields enhances his work earlier than the Patent Office and on appeals to the Federal Circuit. The background gives him familiarity with technical concepts that often arise in patent prosecution and disputes. Over the years he has mixed that technical grounding with courtroom practice and filings on the USPTO to advise clients on patent-related questions.
At Cobert Haber & Haber, LLP he serves as an attorney and partner. He handles matters that require coordination among trial courts, federal appeals practice, and administrative proceedings at the Patent Office. Clients see him for patent prosecution duties and for litigation in federal court, which includes appellate work. He keeps a lively practice in these areas and continues to represent clients before the USPTO and in federal courts, which includes appeals on the Federal Circuit.
He presently focuses his practice on patent prosecution and federal patent litigation.
