About Armen
Armen Kiramijyan observed an unconventional route into the court. He studied economics at the University of Southern California, earning both a bachelor’s diploma and a MBA, and later added a law degree from California Western School of Law. The aggregate of economics training and law school training shapes the manner he approaches disputes. He looks for styles in records. He focuses on the argument that may matter to judges.
Kiramijyan began his professional legal career following law school and moved into legal proceedings that reached appellate panels and federal tribunals. Over time he carved out work in appeals and federal practice. He spends much of his time writing briefs and preparing for oral argument. He also handles the pretrial motions and jurisdictional questions that determine whether or not a case shall be heard at the merits.
He is admitted to practice in California and before numerous federal appellate courts, which includes the Federal Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, and the D.C. Circuit. Those admissions allow him to comply with a matter through trial courts into the appellate segment without interruption. In briefing and argument he objectives to present concise issue statements and to marshal the record effectively. Judges and opposing counsel frequently face lengthy administrative records; his practice is to lessen complexity to a few decisive points.
Kiramijyan’s background in economics and enterprise informs his strategy to legal problems. He treats damages calculations, regulatory records, and contract disputes as numerical puzzles in addition to legal ones. That point of view can change the form of appellate strategy. He has a tendency to interrupt giant questions into smaller legal and factual additives, then test every component towards precedent and the record.
He practices at KAASS LAW, the place he advocates for clients in appeals and related federal matters. His work ranges from drafting appellate briefs to arguing before circuit panels. He additionally counsels trial lawyers on preserving problems for appeal, ensuring that record improvement aligns with potential appellate strategies.
Those who work with him describe a methodical strategy to legal proceedings. He emphasizes preparation, readability in briefing, and performance in presenting oral argument. He continues to grow appellate techniques suited to the circuits in which he practices. He practices appellate and federal litigation at KAASS LAW.
